On Eating Dog, or Pig as Human’s Bestest Friend

Nicolette Hahn Niman wrote for the Atlantic (11/04/2010) claiming that there was a flaw in vegan arguments. (If one can write like this and write for the Atlantic, then I want to get in on that racket).

The argument is the vegan one that eating a pig is the moral equivalent of eating a dog.

Niman thinks there are two reasons why this is wrong:

First, individuals and cultures have always made countless decisions about what things are food and what are not.


More importantly, the pig-equals-dog claim ignores the glaringly obvious issue of relationships. The human relationship with dogs is unique. For as many as 30,000 years, dogs have literally been indispensible members of the human family. Quite naturally, many humans have qualms about eating a family member.

I really don’t understand Niman. But I’m going to try…

The first argument is true, there are a number of reasons some things end up as food and others don’t, mostly just cultural preference. So yes, pig and dog are not the same.

That’s a boring argument, and doesn’t need to be there, because even Niman doesn’t seem to consider it the meat of the article.

The important distinction is that humans (except Chinese and Hawaiian folks apparently, uh-oh Niman) have a natural connection with dogs forged through 30,000 years of cohabitation. Dogs are family, if not by blood and gene, by association and proximity.

Dr. James Serpell, director of the Center for the Interaction of Animals and Society at University of Pennsylvania, extends this mutual dependence across the globe. “The dog became a symbiotic partner with us,” he says. “It has become like another limb, an extension of ourselves.”

Dogs aren’t just family, they are us! I’m digging the Deleuzean logic rumbling under her arguments, but she’s missing something. Morality and ethics, and the heart of the vegan argument.

Dogs are animals, we recognize them as nonhuman entities. Yet, following Niman’s logic, dogs are almost as human as we are, and therefore it is wrong to eat them. But dogs are no more smarter, caring, or special than a pig, another non-human animal. So is the reason that dogs are okay to protect from stomachs that they are family?

Can ethics play favorites like that?

Instead of engaging the vegan argument where it is: “You don’t eat dogs, so why eat pigs?” Niman turns it around: “You eat pigs, so why not eat dogs.” Which allows her to go on these strange tangents about dogs being the coolest thing since fire. Which allows her to ignore the issue, which is that pigs become bacon and the dog gets to run (semi)free.

Nobody’s saying that she should eat her own dogs. I hope she would never suggest that someone kill their pot-bellied pigs because we don’t have a 30,000 year history with them.

But really, the reply to the vegan argument is simple: “Pigs and dogs are equally edible.”


This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to On Eating Dog, or Pig as Human’s Bestest Friend

  1. adam says:

    My vegan argument would be that “Humans, pigs and dogs are equally edible.” If humans had rights, why did God make them out of meat?

    I think Cora Diamond argues something along the lines that we get the idea of animal rights from human rights, the dignity of “people” extended to more-than-human beings. So while I acknowledge practicing veganism may be inconsequential in the big picture, it is a theoretical commitment to not colonizing the bodies of animal others with the meaning of “meat” or “food,” some assemblage of nutrients, cultural symbol, or solipsistic hedonism.–not a rejection of their ontological edibility, but a refusal to inscribe myself into a particularly perverse societal institution which reduces animal others to some form of anthropocentric capital.

    • Royce says:

      Why did he make us out of meat? So we could be eaten by others.

      You know I was never much of a believer in rights to begin with for humans or animals–I deal with them as only tactical constructions for as long as we exist in systems where they are part of the discourse.

      I’ve come to not be too worried about the personal metaphysical benefits of not eating animal others.

  2. Kate says:

    If I were part of a culture where dog eating was commonplace, I’m sure I would be eating dog. “If you wouldn’t eat a dog, don’t eat a pig” makes no sense to me whatsoever.

  3. Ben says:

    Hahaha if dogs are the coolest thing since fire then I propose that we all commence eating fire as soon as possible, or at least start finding a way to do that.

Talk Back

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s